Interrupting reviews to examine the next-gen systems

Here’s my PS3-Wii article for everyone.  I haven’t touched a console since I left home.  How sad.  Anyhow, here are my two cents.  Or two half cents.  Which equals a cent.  So I guess that means here are my cent.  Here is my cent.  Yes.  There it is.  Okay, will stop babbling now.

Anyhow, the PS3 (and Xbox 360, if we’re going to compare all of the so-called next-gen systems) is like the brawny cousin.  It can run so many gigs in a second and can do lightning-fast backflips to boot.  The Wii is the picked-on little brother that can do pretty neat tricks, but people don’t think it can do much more than that.

Oh, wait.  What was important about them again?

What makes a system worth buying?  Games.

And quality games can come from large or small developers.  That’s something I’m trying to prove here.  You don’t have to be Ubisoft or Nintendo or Sony to release a good game.  You need imagination.  Drive.

And Guybrush.  Or maybe not Guybrush, but characters that can carry a game.  Or maybe I’m just old-fashioned in that sense.

For example, the Wii has Link, the stalwart, unspeaking hero that captured hearts from day one.  And by day one, I mean the very first Legend of Zelda game ever made.  We love him (except for that little hiccup that was Zelda CD).  Guys want to be that cool.  Girls wish their boyfriends were that cool (or, they want to be that cool, too.  Who doesn’t want to master the great Link stare?).

And then there’s gameplay.  Yes, Wii gameplay is original.  But when will it stop being a novelty and start being an essential part of a developer’s ideas? Or is the controller better?

In any case, I guess all that I’m saying is that the only thing that will be important in gaming for this generation is the games themselves.  That’s it. Not processing speed or a fancy new way to play.  Just the way the developers utilize it.  We’ll just have to wait and see.

(You’ll be returned to your regularly scheduled blog now…)

Advertisements

4 Responses to Interrupting reviews to examine the next-gen systems

  1. Joestar says:

    I’m… not too sure on what to think about the Wii.

    It’ll probably be like the DS, where there was a bundle of praises for the touchscreen capabilities when it first came out. Know looking back, the best games for the DS seem to be like Mario64; New Mario Bros; Mario Kart; Advance Wars… not only are they First-Party produced games, they don’t even *need* to use the touchscreen for the gameplay.

    OK, there’s the occasional exception such as Ouendan/Elite Beat Agents (that game is awesome!)

    But the Wii is pretty much all about the the controller… so I guess developers don’t have a choice(!) That could be it’s downfall…

    I’d still want one 😛

  2. Joy says:

    Joe — I want a Wii, too! 🙂 I guess I shouldn’t say that too fast, might come out sounding wrong. You’re right — many of the good DS games don’t use a touch screen. I’m waiting for Rune Factory to come out. (I even reneged on buying Harvest Moon to do so). We’ll see how the developers play out for the Wii. I see a lot of games using the controller sideways. 🙂

  3. Tannas says:

    This post hit the nail on the head for me, as much as I’d love to buy myself a PS3, there aren’t any games out yet that’d actually justify me buying one, a FFVII remake might do the trick though ;D

    Keep up the good work ^_^

  4. Joy says:

    Thanks Tannas! I want Metal Gear Solid 4… >

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: